![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wikipedia added a new villain called Madhatter and Two-Face revealed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman:_Arkham_Asylum
__________________
Multi Color. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ya know for some reason I get the impression you're the one editing the info on wiki.
First Tech, now Two-Face? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont edit stuff on wiki.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mad Hatter would be cool but its wikipedia, therefore it's not entirely true until we get some hard evidence.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed. Like some screenshots, or better yet, a reveal trailer like Bane's and Harley's.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is definetlly spam since next to the name the villain does not have a source to wether or not their confirmation was real. Bottom line false information.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
They also put Clayface, Cluemaster, Ventriloquist, and Firefly which I find to be false.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably false, but I do still hope Hatter and Two-Face appear in this. Mad Hatter is still probably one of the most underutilized Batman villains cause everyone immediately assumes that he's just a goofy stylized villain that only does Hat Crimes, when really he could be a lot more if writers would just give the character a chance.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
i want beat Killer Croc !!!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Madhatter and Two-Face are not confimed, until we hear something from Eidos or Rocksteady, no. Wiki is from a bunch of people who have nothing to do, some are true and yes it's handy, but it's not always true.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|