New info from Game Informer

[TranceTrouble]

Originally Posted by Shaikh

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/05/...led-black-list

They keeping an eye on it Ok, but they state only the obvious that it are rumours

[Shaikh]

Originally Posted by TranceTrouble

They keeping an eye on it Ok, but they state only the obvious that it are rumours

Yes but this is 2012. Rumors somehow come true. Even the TR delay rumor finally comes out as true.

[TranceTrouble]

Originally Posted by Shaikh

Yes but this is 2012. Rumors somehow come true. Even the TR delay rumor finally comes out as true.

yeah but believing rumors or twisting it to say its for sure is very dangerous since a lot of people will get upset when it turns out it is not going to happen. I myself am just waiting for official details we get from our community manager Meagan or by official press releases.

[wonderpho]

I've heard of this game before but I wasn't interested because I'd thought it's just UC with a girl, however the new infos made me excited for TR because I love the RPG elements, exploration, wildlife ...



As for the rumor about the new Splinter Cell being called Blacklist, it's now officially confirmed by Ubisoft.

[LadyRufina]

Originally Posted by wonderpho

I've heard of this game before but I wasn't interested because I'd thought it's just UC with a girl, however the new infos made me excited for TR because I love the RPG elements, exploration, wildlife ...



As for the rumor about the new Splinter Cell being called Blacklist, it's now officially confirmed by Ubisoft.

UC with a girl?!!!!

Gurrrrl, we've got off on a bad foot already...

[d1n0_xD]

^ Haha, waited for your comment, LadyR

[LadyRufina]

Originally Posted by d1n0_xD

^ Haha, waited for your comment, LadyR

You know i'm always the first to shove my oar in...

[Driber]

Originally Posted by Shaikh

Yes but this is 2012. Rumors somehow come true. Even the TR delay rumor finally comes out as true.

I think someone needs a lesson in statistics

What you posted so far here proves absolutely nothing about the so called "reliability" of neogaf.

Only rumours that end up being verified are remembered. The hundreds or thousands of other rumours that stay exactly that, rumours, are quickly forgotten.

Originally Posted by TranceTrouble

yeah but believing rumors or twisting it to say its for sure is very dangerous since a lot of people will get upset when it turns out it is not going to happen. I myself am just waiting for official details we get from our community manager Meagan or by official press releases.

Very true.

It is exactly the likes of the earlier posted IGN article that creates unnecessary drama for the fans.

If big news sites would just stick with the facts and not try to harvest more traffic with sleazy tactics like we've seen in the recent "attempted rape" controversy, then we would all be off a lot better.

Tabloid "journalism" doesn't make any website "reliable". Quite the opposite, actually

[Shaikh]

Originally Posted by Driber

I think someone needs a lesson in statistics

What you posted so far here proves absolutely nothing about the so called "reliability" of neogaf.

Only rumours that end up being verified are remembered. The hundreds or thousands of other rumours that stay exactly that, rumours, are quickly forgotten.

I don't get it? Why you have to bring back old stuff like one month or two months! This post was two months old, and just got that infraction for a 1 month old post! Looks like some people are too lazy!

95% rumors now-a-days are true. And that rumor from IGN/NeoGAF(my quoted post) was also true. The new Splinter Cell is really called Black List. A lot of people get news/stuff before it outed officially. Here's an example what Alex Hutchinson, director of Assassin's Creed III, said yesterday in an interview to IGN:

The games industry is terrible for secrets, and I’m kind of bored of working on things where everybody’s seen everything before we launch.

And for the record it is rumor, not rumour.

[Driber]

Originally Posted by Shaikh

I don't get it? Why you have to bring back old stuff like one month or two months! This post was two months old, and just got that infraction for a 1 month old post! Looks like some people are too lazy!

Nothing wrong with responding to a 1 month old post. Members do it all the time and there is no rule against this in our TOU. In case you're interested in why I did, you may read my latest post in the Humble Abode.

You are lucky I am stick skinned, so I will ignore your "lazy" remark. However, I would advice you to adjust your manners, as you have already been warned about your behaviour many times before, even by Meagan. Although we are lenient around here, we do not tolerate rude behaviour over an extended period of time.

You have received your first official infraction today for your earlier forum TOU violation. Keep this up and one of us may have to issue a time-out. I hope it does not have to come to that and that it will stay with the 1 infraction, though.

If you wish to discuss this further, take it into PM. The public board is not the place for members to discuss administrative actions.

Originally Posted by Shaikh

And for the record it is rumor, not rumour.

Both "rumour" and "rumor" are correct; one is British English and the other is American English.

[Dollpy]

I read this last week or so. My brother-in-law is subscribed to GameInformer. Nice article. He thinks I'm a derp for wanting to keep the magazine as collecting. He just reads the interesting stuff to him and throws them away.