It3llig3nc3
03-19-2007, 06:39 AM
I wanted to post this up before but always forgot to capture it:
http://www.szentmiklosi.com/BSM_glitch.jpg
While it is a very nice feature to auto-detect configuration changes some kind of a "tolerance" would have been nice to program into it so it's not trying to advocate review of options for a 1Mhz change which is obviously nothing special...
This title especially seems to have trouble with the Core 2 Duo processors since the configuration determination goes by processor clock speed (higher the better - the program assumes) and the Core 2 Duo puts a nice twist on it - lower clock rate but better performance than a Pentium 4 or Pentium D.
It should have been better to check on the Processor ID and conclude based on that and NOT on Mhz altogether...
http://www.szentmiklosi.com/BSM_glitch.jpg
While it is a very nice feature to auto-detect configuration changes some kind of a "tolerance" would have been nice to program into it so it's not trying to advocate review of options for a 1Mhz change which is obviously nothing special...
This title especially seems to have trouble with the Core 2 Duo processors since the configuration determination goes by processor clock speed (higher the better - the program assumes) and the Core 2 Duo puts a nice twist on it - lower clock rate but better performance than a Pentium 4 or Pentium D.
It should have been better to check on the Processor ID and conclude based on that and NOT on Mhz altogether...