snodawg
01-02-2006, 11:40 AM
As with pretty much everything in the current media sphere, there seems to be a high American dominance in this game. Since Eidos decided to go for a small amount of expensive, epic games it has seemed to pander to American influence.
Whilst I understand that the nature of the market economy of the USA, coupled with the fact of a large population mostly of a singular language and shared-profile demographic can be very lucrative to what is, in essence, a business such as Eidos, can it not move away from what I described in a previous Hitman deconstruction (http://forums.eidosgames.com/showthread.php?p=531573#post531573) as xenophobia.
This is not due to the fact that levels are not set in the UK, more towards that 3 locations so far revealed out of 4 are set in the USA (Rocky Mountains, Las Vegas, Mississippi). Whilst setting a level in the USA certainly makes business and gameplay sense - setting four is just overboard in my opinion.
The game itself seems by far advanced of the previous titles in the series, but it seems that Eidos have now neglected the country from which they came - the UK. Although they still have a British influence with characters such as Lara Croft and in more relevant terms, 47 and Diana, does this mean that they have to make up for it? This certainly seems the case in Hitman: Blood Money.
Whilst I understand that the nature of the market economy of the USA, coupled with the fact of a large population mostly of a singular language and shared-profile demographic can be very lucrative to what is, in essence, a business such as Eidos, can it not move away from what I described in a previous Hitman deconstruction (http://forums.eidosgames.com/showthread.php?p=531573#post531573) as xenophobia.
This is not due to the fact that levels are not set in the UK, more towards that 3 locations so far revealed out of 4 are set in the USA (Rocky Mountains, Las Vegas, Mississippi). Whilst setting a level in the USA certainly makes business and gameplay sense - setting four is just overboard in my opinion.
The game itself seems by far advanced of the previous titles in the series, but it seems that Eidos have now neglected the country from which they came - the UK. Although they still have a British influence with characters such as Lara Croft and in more relevant terms, 47 and Diana, does this mean that they have to make up for it? This certainly seems the case in Hitman: Blood Money.