View Full Version : The Light
04-01-2004, 12:44 AM
To the best knowledgability based in our socio-political structure of todays society, I wanted to provide some additional information. The "Illuminati" was found by Adam Weisphault on May 1, 1776. He was a 33 degree Freemason belonging to the Original Bravarian Society. The biggest influence he had on modern society is the use of our current economical infa-structure,
Multi-Input; Single-Output, which is the very reason you have to wake up and go to work tommorow morning, and the elder couple that drives the new cadillac, with the "compass and square" symbol on there back window, who participates at the local lodge, doesnt. Or why your school provides you "trik-nology" and the members of the skull and bones, or scroll and key societies attending harvard will soon probally work for the Bilderberg Group, TC, CFR, Rockefeller, UN, or MJ-12 (majestic 12) whom is actually a real society claimed to be responible for such actions like "Project Galileo", "Project Red Light", and most scientic occurances today. The Knights Templar is also very real, and is only one of many societies such as, Bohemian Club, Catholics, Free-Masons, Order of Malta, Brotherhood of Light, ect.. Truth be told this country was founded on the idea " Problem, Reaction, Solution". Create your problem, monitor you reaction, then provide the solution. and the solution is always in YOUR better interest, whatever that is......... and whoever "your is..... I think EYE have a pretty good idea though.....
04-02-2004, 04:27 AM
Nice. Make an intelligent suggestion and get your post wiped. I'm guessing this board aint for the followers of free speech then...
04-02-2004, 07:40 AM
Umm.... trigger happy moderators ahoy?
04-03-2004, 04:24 PM
trigger happy indeed! I thought we all had the right to express our own opinions and views eh?
04-04-2004, 02:14 PM
All I said was that the poll should have had more thought put into it, I wasn't trying to offend or upset anyone, that's not my aim at all. My objective is to learn all I can and pass on as much as possible to those who care to listen.
When you said communism and democracy are basically the same thing, what were you thinking? Do the citizens of Democratic nations such as England, France or America live under the same political system as China? No, Clearly not. There are very significant differences between the two which merit a seperate choice in any poll such as this.
As I said before, go do some reading and hopefully you will come to see the truth in what I say... If this doesn't get blasted out of existence by those trigger happy mods... again.
04-09-2004, 12:51 AM
In my first reply. It wasnt to critisize or degenerate the information you provided. I was supplying additional reference to the context that I personally sought intriguing in the first place. When I made the gesture "democraucy or communism (same thing)" I fully understood the concepts and more importantly the differences between these two systems. I was applying the system we have currently established as our infa-structure of modern banking and economy create an intensional series of emotional and physical outputs that are manipulated by intellectual strategists. Using methods of gradual "shocks" to Monopolized Corperations down to the indivisual body of self. Generally under the gradification of a single leader (dictator).
I agree, the poll was a bit "exterior" to the current dealings in our world, but giving I follow General Semantics, it is an enevidable and realistic sense of truth.
I was unaware they booted it out. It is exactually what I figured what happen. The hell with them. We will impose free speech for as long as we can provide it, It is vital people with the understanding or "enlightenment" if you will, to wake these people up. There are people who still think the world is flat.
04-09-2004, 07:51 AM
I apologise if I prejudged you, I understand the restricting nature of these polls.
I'm glad you aren't just another sap, willing to soak up whatever rubbish you get told by teachers, newscasters etc...
In every modern 'democratic' state, there is the problem of generalities. Laws and government policies are all too often created to suit those seen as the majority. However, every human being is an individual and cannot be lumped into any one group.
Helios' idea of a world where the opinion of each individual is taken into consideration is a sound principle, but it would not create a 'free society' - your thoughts would no longer be your own, thus removing that which makes you individual.
Personally, I'm still trying to find a way that a truly fair and free society could be created by the people and not imposed on them
04-10-2004, 06:58 AM
I appreciate your sincerity. You only placed judgement on its contents which is your "free right". I used that same little tactic known as Problem, Reaction, Solution. I posted a poll and statement with details only retrievable by the "select few". Generated a reaction, by that, drawing in the obviously "aknowledged" in, for further collaberation of ideas. You took the bait. By that proving you are a substancial indivisual with a duty to atleast understand you surroundings and the decietful action powerful, wealthy men make in the world. Realistically, I placed that specific poll the view what I would call the "exspectence of modern society", and see how quick it took for the no change option to increment over the other options available. Also, supporting what I think was said best on a interview with Timothy Leary in 1967 when he stated. "In todays society, its hard to break away from the influence of standards in society. See, the idea is you have to be more conforming. It is easier to drift along, then to simply drop out." I would have been excited to see more people choose the modern-day barter system by standard, but Im sure most dont quite exactly understand what that means, or would be, in a act of implamentation. Also I have been working on a legitament formula for roughly 3 years, in regards to the last statement you had made. It is in my best interest not to detail on that subject, until nessacary. I think what impresses me most is the sense of magic held by the "Federal Reserve". It's that trick when you print out a useless papernote and wave the U.S.F.R. wand over it and call it money. You know its magic because we dont possess that wand. I considered writing the treasury department and looking into finding one of those wands, because it would really help my finainces right now. Wow, the idea of taking my 100 dollar bill and exchanging it at the local bank for raw minerals of equal value, what a great idea, I wish we could still do that....J.P. I think people such as Warren Spector, Robert Anton Wilson, William Cooper, Alex Jones, should all be commemerated on there continuess work of "telling the truth", I mean.... who really believes intellectual men of high political power would use ingenius strategies to impose a unicent of organized living, come on, what dumb ass thinks people just wake up in the morning to issue proclamations, and National Security Directives, to create a conglomerata of institutions for the better establishment of there uniform ideas, thats...thats , that has to be the most truthful remark i have ever heard, I should be ashamed of myself.
04-10-2004, 07:09 AM
For those of you whose chose Universal Law, i will be posting some of the manuscripts from the new book Im writing entiteld "Universal Law: Restrictions unlimited" soon. I will provide a link for that. I have chose to post a pretext that I had wrote, to give you a general idea of what I personally see as Universal Law, and why I deed it so important. As well as what I think a more vast mojority of rhetoric to this topic see as Universal Law. I advise anyone regardless of your creed, to interpret my version of the golden rule that lies in Universal Law. "Do Unto Self, As You Would Want Done To You". This introduction is a bit difficult to follow, considering the rest of the book is a bit more refined.
Introduction: The "I" Administration
Prelude- To contrast on to the basic functionality of the Tri-Cardal system, By use of my recently founded coeffiency formula Triplucicity, its of better interest to overview the understanding of reutamentay concepts of any systems operations, and effects and benifactors within the infa-structure. To aknowledge anything on a complex scale of mass preportion requires to systematically "break-down" the variables of the objects science. Science is simply finding a general and legitamite understanding to the objective in question. Man, since the beginning, has yearned to understand what they do not know or can not literally except into there database (mind) of factial elements (knowledge). Furthermore, to advertedly contain the supportive conclusion in the human electronic & chemical medium (brain), with use of knowledge application requires the obtainment of a internal organization agreement between property and ecology, better personified as understanding. Understanding at best, is the administration of an ecology into the confinement of an enviroment in which one or more physical objects create a statistical foundation for using its self comparision anylasis to determine an agreeable stasis amungst its energetic limitations. Whether domestic, foriegn or anomolous, mans best concept of understanding has been based by these principle physics. We as humans, have based our understanding from the two primary involentary aspects encoded in our natural genetic design. By monitoring interactivity between " domestic (to earth) neural conductancy (senses) and the energy its contained within. I solely believe, that mans first primitive experiences onto earth, were not based upon aknowledgement of the phyics of energy in association with the controlled senses of its physical unit. Although, I do believe it to be discovered by the simple ideaology of manipulation (control) of any given enviroment by means of interconnectivity between energy output (situation) and energy input (acceptance).
If supported, this factor alone justifies the predictable foundation of adaptability to be fully circumstantual, decremating the idea there ever has been a mere "cequencedence". A direct result would bring one to conclude the possibility of our exsistence to be based from a "conclusion for a descended disfunction". THIS WOULD UNINDOUBTABLY SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE WE ARE EVIDENCE FROM A PREDETERMINED SOCIAL STRUCTURE, MODIFIED FOR THE CONTINUATION OF A SIMILAR SOCIETY STRUCTURE. EVEN IN OPPOSITION, ONES LOGICAL CONCLUSION WOULD STILL BE BASED UPON THE METHOLOGY THAT SOCIAL AUTOMATION WAS A PREVOKED ASSESMENT BY AN INATIE OBTAINING UNDERSTANDING OF "lIFE VALUE" TRANSACABILITY AND RELOCATION OF ENERGY WITHIN THE UNIVERSAL ENVIROMENT. This would make it over evident that the relationship between socio-phycology and emotional interpretation are a predetermnined standard in the biological make-up of any genetically structured life-form. With all this complexity "understood", one can not rashionally explain the birthing of association through identification and entitlement (i.e. we all can commonly agree that the sky is blue). One could only assume the configuration of data-language repository is simply to institue some organization within any social structure. This leaves numerous questions to be evaluated. Such as, who gave this energy body (property of the universe) the actual classification as we know it, Universe (lauguage description)? Here is a simple excercise to support this idea. Using mans practical knowledge and understanding, observing mans primitive and modern terminology is based within the restrictions of his percieved enviroment, thus stating the universe itself is mans most vast provision, we can assume "universe" has a bold defiency to mankind as well as the majority of anomolous life. Logical chronilog would easily implie Universe is the start, the alpha of energy and exsistence, who defined its title? Better yet, consider this statements end result. "Whats before the Universe?" In a quick conclusion, one may easily say ,"blackness, blank, dark, white, nothing", or simply "I dont know."
One problem, each of those are defined terms for man kinds organization unit. It couldnt be blank, "Whats before blank, or black?" "What is blank or black?" Even in the context you say "clear or translucent" a property of material matter that doesnt collorlate any imagery, so what is it, through the translucency, on the other side? You soon find regardless of what you say, you are simply restricted to your own understanding, nothing more. This only illistrates man imprisonment to his own mind resource, mans only resource of self. Even within the imagination, mans self intitled gateway to all recieved data. Allowing one to diversify all understanding to any formality (create any illusion of all possible memory data, in any collabrative or Unary sense, within any givin time allotincy, without altercation to your physical enviroment). i.e. As I say " Purple elephant revolving around a bonsai tree on a burning *****ulated island" you automatically "imagined" the statement. Its probally a profoundly different image, it was based upon the same social properties managed by memory and Identification. BY, SIMPLY BEING ABLE TO IMAGINE ANY VERBAL OR EMOTIONAL THOUGHT, MEANT IT WAS BASED UPON THE SOCIETYS BASIC PROPERTIES OF COMPARISION WITH IDENTITY. At this point I imagine you are wondering what in the hell does this have to do with anything in relation to your Tri-Cardalism System. Answer, everything. This alone is the simple reason why it has been possible to create an invertment within our modern adoptive Socio-political economic model. Please note for the record, the indivisuals in charge of this financial continuation system have not only determined this oggulence, but use its most sophisticated functions of mathematics, electronic and neuraltronic microwaves, scale dio-convergency (nanotechnology), time-space continum communication transfer (time-travel on a humanistic scale), Global & Universal positioning systems (GPS & Sloan Digital Sky Survey, 2Mass) and even more conventional functions like advantages relating mass descolent bodies of uninhabited properties. It is no suprise to first wonder the legitamicy of the accusations, and the issues being based upon this new age technology, this is a safe natural exspectancy. I do not want to first all off subject, I simply feel its important as a tenent of this succint operation, to comphrehend the preliminary subjectives established as well as, and more importantly to quickly identify the "BIGGER PICTURE". The emphesetic statements are exact reason you, as well as "I", are pawns in this strategic counter-system. I use the term counter-system because, OUR CURRENT ECONOMICAL "MULTI-INPUT SINGLE-OUTPUT" SYSTEM HAS NO REAL INTENTION OR JUSTIFICATION EXCEPT FOR UNIFICATION OF SUPERIORITY, TO CREATE A UTOPICAL TOTALTARIAN SYSTEM IN THE BETTER INTEREST OF THE MOTIVES ESTABLISHED BY THERE SEGRAGATION. NOT ONLY DOES IT NOT HAVE PURPOSE, IT HAS BEEN EQUIPPED FOR YOUR COOPERATION OF MANUAL WORK LABOR IN EXCHANGE OF UNVALUABLE PAPERNOTE, TO DEDICATE YOUR EXISTENCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THERES. If you have made it this far, it is respectful to make the two assuptions 1) You already contain a general overview of the true intent of our ecological future, due to the allowence of open mind and a monosyntactic mind state. 2) You capitalize your desicions based upon humanitys gesture to create and destroy for the general interest of all men and womens good-will. Later In the book i will speak more detailed on this ideas. I leave this introduction with noting the attitude of the Tricardal future. I recommend all persons adopt this statement, reagadless of how much it hurts to think about, but the quicker you grab it, you immidiately accept this social liberal concept. "THE WORST POSSIBLE OUTCOME IS THE STRENGTH OF THE BEST POSSIBLE PREFIX IN LIFE, DEATH, THE WORST THEY CAN DO IS TORTURE YOU, BUT PAIN IS IMINATE, AND WILL ONLY SERVE/* THE SO-ANTISIPATED MURDER OF THAT ESTABLISHMENT AND ITS PEOPLE. DEATH COULD BE CONSIDERED THE BEST PART OF LIFE.
04-11-2004, 05:46 AM
Good start, I like the ideas you have begun to bring up.
If I may ask, without wishing to sound rude, what is your native language? I say this only because I noticed several grammatical/ spelling errors throughout the extract.
I would be more than happy to provide spellchecking and proofreading for you if you would allow me the privilege. ;)
04-11-2004, 12:31 PM
Before I answer that, there are two very important details about me that may assist the grammar quality in my writings.1) I am 19 years of age( as I believe I read you were in your profile). 2) I am a class 1 literate dislexic. It doesnt shun my intellegience, but it does has effects on my spelling and grammar abilities. Also, the "I" administation was a preliminary draft that I havent had the time to proofread. I would be appreciative to have another intellegent mind help in aiding my writing. I have come to learn even in my short life length, that I contain absolute power over the most two deadliest weapons available; The Mind and The Computer (hence, hence, we both know the outcome of an adolescent body under the control of a deadly weapon.) I also know the threats and influences in modern society isnt the old man with the historical knowledge of politics and banking. It is young adults just like you and I, who are two prone to "**** and load" our deadly weapons and fire on contact. Needless to say, it is always in the better interest of humanity. Not to strain away from your question though, I am a pure breed southern'er from the florida panhandle. Born and raised, although all of my family is Irish. More interesting than that, I have publicated and produced, composed and written music based on the subjects deus ex cover for many years. I would love to send you a few songs, as well as I will try to attach my newest song to this page. I have 7 underground LP's already completed. I am currently close to completion of my newer LP, under my newest music label I recently established; Tri-Pyramid Productions.
04-11-2004, 11:04 PM
Tripyramid, let paragraphs be your new friend..... :p
04-12-2004, 08:17 AM
I apologise if it seemed I was assuming too much about you without truly knowing you, being blunt is often the easiest way of getting information. Even if it is a little tactless...
I would love to hear your music, I'm always on the lookout for new and interesting things to listen to, A friend of mine is on the way to getting signed in the next few months!
I'm flying out to Australia for the next four months on thursday but I will endeavour to return to the boards as and when I can.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.